Committee on House Administration topper image
#
header_mid _left Relief Sculptures in the Rotunda
"William Penn and the Indians" - William Penn is shown at center with the Delaware Indians at the time of the Treaty of Shackamaxon.  This treaty formalized the purchase of land in Pennsylvania and cemented an amicable relationship between the Quakers and the Indians for almost a hundred years.  Penn was the last figure on which Brumidi worked.
header bottom left
#
#
COMMITTEE SCHEDULE
<   05/04/08 to 05/17/08   >
SMTWTFS
04050607080910
11121314151617
View Full Calendar

Click here to view Committee Proceedings Live
Next Live Feed: 05/14/2008
2:00:00 PM EST

Topic:
Subcommittee on Elections Hearing on “Election Contingency Plans: What Have We Learned and Is America Prepared?”

Note: Please use Windows Media Player or a compatible player to view the live feed.


SIGNUP FOR E-MAIL UPDATES
PRESS RELEASES
Brady response to Supreme Court Decision on Voter ID

Brady Ensures Military Liaisons Access to House Fitness Facilities

Nationally Syndicated Radio Host Tom Joyner to Testify Before Committee on House Administration

#
Home
TRANSLATE # A+ | A- | Reset # Print this page E-mail a link to this page
FEATURE STORY:
Brady response to Supreme Court Decision on Voter ID

Taxi Reimbursement(April 28, 2008) Washington, DC: Today, the United States Supreme Court issued its decision upholding an Indiana law requiring that voters produce photo identification. In explaining their decision, the majority cited concerns over voter fraud and ensuring voter confidence in the election system. This judgment has far-reaching implications for the imposition of voter ID requirements in other states.

In November of 2007, I joined with my colleagues Rep. Zoe Lofgren and Senator Dianne Feinstein in filing an amicus brief arguing the inconsistency of Indiana’s photo-identification requirements for federal elections with federal law and the degree to which they disenfranchise voters. I strongly believe that voter confidence in our electoral system can only be achieved by maximizing the participation of eligible voters. What is most disturbing about the Court's decision today is the complete lack of any evidence that the legislation serves any purpose other than making it more difficult for some to vote. Unnecessary barriers to full and unimpeded participation irreparably damage our system of government and calls into question its integrity.

more...
 

#
SITE SEARCH
SITE MAP
HOT ISSUES


HIGHLIGHTS


SEARCH LEGISLATION
(THOMAS)
 

#
# # #

Committee On House Administrationbullet1309 Longworth BuildingbulletWashington, DC 20515bulletTelephone: 202-225-2061bulletFax: 202-226-2774

PRIVACY POLICY