FEATURE STORY:
Brady response to Supreme Court Decision on Voter ID
(April 28, 2008) Washington, DC: Today, the United States Supreme Court issued its decision upholding an Indiana law requiring that voters produce photo identification. In explaining their decision, the majority cited concerns over voter fraud and ensuring voter confidence in the election system. This judgment has far-reaching implications for the imposition of voter ID requirements in other states.
In November of 2007, I joined with my colleagues Rep. Zoe Lofgren and Senator Dianne Feinstein in filing an amicus brief arguing the inconsistency of Indiana’s photo-identification requirements for federal elections with federal law and the degree to which they disenfranchise voters. I strongly believe that voter confidence in our electoral system can only be achieved by maximizing the participation of eligible voters. What is most disturbing about the Court's decision today is the complete lack of any evidence that the legislation serves any purpose other than making it more difficult for some to vote. Unnecessary barriers to full and unimpeded participation irreparably damage our system of government and calls into question its integrity.
more...